<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My IT Byte - Computers &#124; Internet &#124; Technology &#124; Hosting &#124; Proxy &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myitbyte.com/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myitbyte.com</link>
	<description>Portal about computers, technologies, internet and electronics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Windows Vista SP1- Is it faster?</title>
		<link>http://www.myitbyte.com/2008/02/15/microsoft-windows-vista-sp1-is-it-faster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myitbyte.com/2008/02/15/microsoft-windows-vista-sp1-is-it-faster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>midowo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitbyte.com/2008/02/15/microsoft-windows-vista-sp1-is-it-faster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are waiting for this package for a long time now,because experts say us that Vista in its first appearance wasn&#8217;t ready and that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s functionality in some aspects weren&#8217;t as good as we expected. IS this problem solved in this first SP1? Microsoft promise us that Windows Vista Sp1 Will be Faster and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="lw_context_ads"><p><img src="http://www.myitbyte.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/vistasp1.thumbnail.jpg" alt="VistaSp1" align="left" />We are waiting for this package for a long time now,because experts say us that Vista in its first appearance wasn&#8217;t ready and that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s functionality in some aspects weren&#8217;t as good as we expected. IS this problem solved in this first SP1?</p>
<p>Microsoft promise us that Windows Vista Sp1 Will be Faster and a lot of mistakes will be repaired. We will try to solve this question offering you a view in the CNET accomplished first SP1 test&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I have to tell that CNET results aren&#8217;t reasonable because in some aspect&#8217;s the operations are faster but in other they aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>In this Service package are included a lot of new driver versions, what are noticeably upgraded the fastness of them, but a lot of theme where available before to those who had the automatic upgrades turned ON. Microsoft have invested a lot of finance&#8217;s in this Project.</p>
<p>In tests the biggest high-speed increasing where noticed in file copying &#8211; the speed have increased about 40 to 50 %. Interesting is that copying to USB speed is reduced , but generally the speed is increased.  Microsoft Promise us that they will fix this problem with USB in short time.</p>
<p>Overall conclusion is that Almost none of us will be able to feel the difference between the Original Vista and the SP1, because only the file copying speed is increased. But a lot of mistakes have been fixed.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myitbyte.com/2008/02/15/microsoft-windows-vista-sp1-is-it-faster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office 2008 will be available in January</title>
		<link>http://www.myitbyte.com/2007/09/28/office-2008-will-be-available-in-january/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myitbyte.com/2007/09/28/office-2008-will-be-available-in-january/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitbyte.com/2007/09/28/office-2008-will-be-available-in-january/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft have announced that Office 2008 for Mac will be available for users in January of next year. Overall there will be three office packages. The first &#8211; &#8220;Office 2008 for Mac Home and Student Edition&#8221; includes &#8220;Word&#8221;, &#8220;Excel&#8221;, &#8220;PowerPoint&#8221;, &#8220;Entourage&#8221; (multi functional mail client) and mostly will be for home users. The second version [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="lw_context_ads"><p><img src="http://www.myitbyte.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/of-lg_0.thumbnail.jpg" alt="office2008" align="left" />Microsoft have announced that Office 2008 for Mac will be available for users in January of next year. Overall there will be three office packages.</p>
<p>The first &#8211; &#8220;Office 2008 for Mac Home and Student Edition&#8221; includes &#8220;Word&#8221;, &#8220;Excel&#8221;, &#8220;PowerPoint&#8221;, &#8220;Entourage&#8221; (multi functional mail client) and mostly will be for home users.</p>
<p>The second version will be simply &#8220;Office 2008 for Mac&#8221;, without &#8220;Home and Student Edition. Probably there will be available &#8220;Windows Exchange Server&#8221; (that is for professionals).</p>
<p>And lastly the third &#8211; &#8220;Special Media Edition&#8221; that also includes &#8220;Expression Media&#8221; that is for photos editing and organization.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myitbyte.com/2007/09/28/office-2008-will-be-available-in-january/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
